NashTech Blog

Playwright vs Selenium: Which option to choose?

Table of Contents

1. What is Playwright?

Playwright is an open-source cross-browser web automation library developed by Microsoft that allows developers to automate browser actions and interactions. It is specifically designed to address end-to-end testing needs, allowing for faster and more consistent testing across multiple browsers.

It is compatible with some operating systems Windows, Linux, and MacOS, and can be integrated with major CI/CD servers such as Jenkins, Azure Pipeline, TravisCI, CircleCI….

It is beneficial for cross-browser testing on complex applications due to its wide coverage, accuracy, and high speed. It offers end-to-end testing through its high-level API, allowing the tester to control headless browsers.

Benefits of Playwright:

  • Cross-browser testing is crucial to ensure that your web application works consistently across different browsers and their versions. Playwright is an excellent tool for achieving this. It supports all major web browsers, including Chromium-based browsers (Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge), WebKit, and Firefox, for end-to-end testing and web automation tasks.
  • Screenshots and screen recording: Playwright includes built-in support for taking screenshots and screen recordings while running tests. You can capture screenshots of the entire page or specific elements, making it easier to understand test failures.
  • Auto-waiting: Playwright offers built-in auto-waiting functionality to eliminate the need for manual waiting, such as custom wait functions. It automatically waits for elements before executing actions or retrieving elements, making writing end-to-end tests more straightforward.
  • Headless and headed modes: Playwright supports headless and headed modes when running browser automation tests. In headless mode, tests can be run in the background without browser windows interfering with workflow. If you need to debug test failures and address browser-specific issues, headed mode is beneficial for debugging, visual testing, and addressing browser-specific issues.
  • Authentication and cookies: Many web applications have different behaviors for authenticated and unauthenticated users. For example, some websites require HTTP authentication to access protected resources. Handling authentication is important when conducting browser testing. Playwright allows testers to simulate the login process and manage user sessions when interacting with a web application. Most single-page applications (SPAs) use cookie-based or token-based authentication to validate users’ identities and grant access to protected resources. Playwright provides “browserContext.storageState ([options])” method that enables you to retrieve the storage state, such as cookies and storage data, from an authenticated context.
  • API testing: Playwright allows you to send HTTP requests directly from Node.js without loading a web page. This is useful for testing your server APIs or validating server-side conditions. With Playwright, you can use the APIContextRequest methods to send various types of HTTP requests (GET, POST, etc.) over the network. You can configure Playwright to set base URLs, headers, and other options for your API requests.
  • Geolocation and device emulation: The user can emulate a real device such as a mobile phone or tablet. This enables you to test your app on any browser without requiring physical access to them. Playwright allows users to simulate browser behavior such as userAgent, screenSize, and viewport. You can set the geolocation coordinates for a browsing context, and then conduct your tests within that context. This allows you to ensure your web application works properly for users in different locations.

2. What is the Selenium?

Selenium is a widely adopted open-source testing framework. It provides a suite of tools and libraries to automate browser interactions. Selenium WebDriver is the most popular component, allowing testers to write tests in various programming languages. It automates browsers and interacts with UI elements to replicate user actions to test whether a web application is functioning as expected.

It supports a wide range of browsers and their different versions to enable cross-browser testing of web applications. It is the most popular framework to test websites and ensure seamless and consistent user experiences across different browser and device combinations. The Selenium suite contains several components, including:

  • Selenium Grid: This component enables running WebDriver scripts on multiple machines and browsers in parallel. Selenium Grid helps quality assurance teams and developers perform cross-platform testing.
  • Selenium WebDriver: WebDriver is an API that allows direct interaction with web browsers. It supports automation across all major browsers rather than focusing on a single browser.
  • Selenium IDE: It is an integrated development environment for creating and editing Selenium test scripts. Selenium IDE allows users to record their browser interactions. It is available as a Chrome and Firefox browser extension.

Benefits of Selenium

  • Cross-browser testing: selenium allows testers to perform cross-browser testing. It supports major browsers, including Google Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari. Selenium’s WebDriver allows users to write test scripts that work across different browsers.
  • Parallel test execution: selenium’s grid component enables developers to run test scripts on multiple browsers and machines in parallel. It distributes test requests among the available nodes (test execution environments). Using parallel test execution with Selenium Grid helps users reduce overall test execution time by distributing test execution across connected environments.
  • Headless and headed modes: Selenium WebDriver supports headless and headed modes when running browser automation tests. Headless mode allows testers to run the browser in the background without displaying its graphical user interface (GUI). Because they do not render the GUI, headless browsers make the testing process faster and more resource-efficient. In contrast, headed mode runs the browser with its GUI visible. This is especially useful when debugging or observing the test execution.
  • Multi-language support: selenium WebDriver provides flexibility by supporting multiple programming languages. You can write your test scripts in the language you’re most comfortable with or that best suits your project, including Java, Python, C#, Ruby to automate browser interactions and test web applications.

3. Playwright vs Selenium comparison

CriteriaPlaywrightSelenium
LanguageSupports multiple languages: JavaScript, Java, Python, C#.Supports multiple languages: JavaScript, Python, C#, Ruby, Perl, PHP.
InstallationEasy to InstallEasy to Install
PrerequisitesNodeJS should be installedJava, Eclipse IDE, SeleniumStandalone Server, Client Language Bindings, and Browser Drivers should be installed
OSWindows, Linux, and Mac OSWindows, Linux, Solaris, and Mac OS
Open SourceOpen Source and FreeOpen Source and Free
Browsers SupportedUse browser contexts to provide isolated sessions within the same browser instance.

Faster and more resource-efficient when creating new sessions.
Chrome, Firefox, IE, Edge Chromium (Selenium 4), Safari, Opera.
Highly suitable for cross-browser testing
SupportSince Playwright is fairly new, the support from the community is limited as compared to SeleniumProvides commercial support for its users via its sponsors and self-support documents. Strong community support from professionals across the world 
DependenciesBuilt-in (playwright install handles browser installation)

Playwright/test (built-in testing framework) 
Separate downloads required (ChromeDriver, GeckoDriver, etc.)

TestNG, PyTest, Appium
Real devices supportSupports real device clouds and remote servers Supports real device clouds and remote servers
ArchitectureHeadless Browser with event-driven architecture. Layered Architecture based on JSON Wire Protocol.
Multiple Pages and TabsRun tests across (No bringing the page in front is required)Need to switch between tabs, frames, etc. before every interaction
InstantiationTypically uses separate browser instances to achieve session isolation.

Slower and more resource-intensive when launching new sessions.
Selenium tends to have a longer startup time, especially when using Selenium Grid to distribute tests across multiple machines

Selenium supports parallel execution through frameworks like TestNG and JUnit, and through Selenium Grid. However, setting up and managing Selenium Grid can be complex and time-consuming

Moderately flaky
Handling PopupsVery easy-to-use popup event listenersUsing Window Handles or in some cases using Robots class
Wait

Automatically waits for elements to be ready before performing actions

Supports explicit waits using methods like waitForSelector, waitForEvent
Requires explicit wait statements to handle readiness

Supports explicit waits using WebDriverWait and ExpectedConditions
ParallelizationAutomatic test sharding across workers
Automatically balances load across workers
Manual configuration needed
Requires custom setup in Grid
PerformancePlaywright is designed to be fast. It launches browsers in a headless mode by default, which reduces the startup time significantly.

Playwright supports parallel test execution out-of-the-box with minimal configuration, enabling faster test runs


Less flaky
Selenium tends to have a longer startup time, especially when using Selenium Grid to distribute tests across multiple machine

Selenium supports parallel execution through frameworks like TestNG and JUnit, and through Selenium Grid. However, setting up and managing Selenium Grid can be complex and time-consuming

Moderately flaky

4. Conclusion

Through the comparison between Playwright and Selenium, we can see that both Playwright and Selenium have some very attractive advantages. With Playwright we can see that with its modern architecture and native support for multiple browser contexts, waiting, reporting, and debugging…, it is also a powerful solution for engineers looking to optimize speed and simplicity in managing concurrent tests across multiple environments. In contrast, Selenium is a massive, widely used, time-tested tool with broad browser support and a large community, making it a versatile choice for complex, long-term projects.

Picture of Men Pham Thi

Men Pham Thi

I am a Senior QC Engineer of NashTech with over 5 years of experienced in automation testing. I always strive to find new ideas to optimize automated testing to save time and costs in testing work while still ensuring the quality of projects and meeting customer expectations.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Suggested Article

Scroll to Top