NashTech Blog

Pre-Trained Models vs Custom-Trained Models: What Testers Need to Know When Testing AI Applications

Table of Contents

AI is showing up everywhere: chatbots, recommendation engines, fraud detection, test automation assistants…
But when testers hear “AI-powered”, one critical question often goes unanswered:

Is this using a pre-trained model, or a model trained with our private data?

This distinction matters a lot for testing. Each approach introduces different risks, responsibilities, and test strategies. In this article, we’ll break down the differences and explain exactly how your testing approach should change.

1. What Is a Pre-Trained Model?

A pre-trained model is trained in advance by a vendor on massive, general-purpose datasets. Teams use it as-is or with minimal configuration.

Common examples

  • Large Language Models (GPT, Claude, Gemini)
  • Vision models (ResNet, YOLO)
  • NLP models (BERT, RoBERTa)

Typically, teams:

  • Do not change the model weights
  • Interact via an API
  • Customize behavior using prompts, parameters, or RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

Simple way to think about it: You’re renting a very smart brain and asking it questions — but you’re not teaching it anything new.

2. What Is a General Model Trained with Private Data?

In this approach, a general (base) model is further trained or fine-tuned using your organization’s private data.

Examples

  • Fine-tuning an LLM with customer support tickets
  • Training a risk model using internal transaction data
  • Custom vision models trained on factory images

Here, the model learns from your data and adapts its behavior accordingly.

Simple way to think about it: You’re teaching the brain how your world works.

3. Key Differences at a Glance

AspectPre-Trained ModelTrained with Private Data
Model ownershipExternalPartial / Full
Learning behaviorFixedLearns from your data
Setup timeFastSlow
CostUsage-basedTraining + infrastructure
Domain accuracyMediumHigh
Data privacy riskLowerHigher
ExplainabilityLimitedMore achievable
MaintenanceVendor-managedYour responsibility

4. Testing AI with Pre-Trained Models

When using a pre-trained model, you are not testing the model itself. You are testing the AI system that wraps around it.

What testers should focus on

1. Prompt testing

  • Prompt clarity and consistency
  • Prompt regression when prompts change
  • Sensitivity to wording changes

2. Output validation

  • Hallucination detection
  • Factual correctness
  • Output format validation
  • Unsafe or toxic responses

3. Bias and ethics

  • Discriminatory outputs
  • Cultural bias
  • Accessibility impact

4. Non-functional testing

  • Response time
  • Cost per request
  • Rate limits and failure handling

What you don’t test

  • Model accuracy metrics
  • Training performance
  • Learning behavior

👉 This is closer to API testing + UX testing + risk testing than traditional ML testing.

5. Testing AI Trained with Private Data

Once a model is trained with private data, the testing scope expands dramatically.

Now you must test:

  • The data
  • The model
  • The training pipeline
  • The production behavior

1. Data testing (often skipped — and dangerous)

  • Data completeness and correctness
  • Label accuracy
  • Bias in training data
  • Data leakage between train and test sets

2. Model testing

  • Accuracy, precision, recall, F1
  • Performance by segment (edge cases matter!)
  • Robustness to noisy or unexpected input
  • Fairness and bias evaluation

3. Training pipeline testing

  • Reproducibility
  • Model versioning
  • Rollback capability
  • Monitoring and alerting

4. Production monitoring

  • Data drift
  • Concept drift
  • Model degradation over time

👉 This is real ML testing, and it requires collaboration between QA, data scientists, and engineering.

6. How Your Test Strategy Should Change

If you use a pre-trained model

Your main question is:

“Can this AI behave badly?”

Your strategy should emphasize:

  • Scenario-based testing
  • Prompt regression suites
  • Safety and compliance checks
  • Monitoring vendor model updates

If you train with private data

Your main question becomes:

“Can this AI learn the wrong thing?”

Your strategy must include:

  • Automated data validation
  • Model evaluation gates
  • Bias and fairness testing
  • Drift detection in production

7. A Rule of Thumb for Testers

If you remember only one thing, remember this:

If the model does not learn → test behavior
If the model learns → test learning This simple rule helps testers avoid applying the wrong testing approach to AI systems.

Final Thoughts

AI testing is not one-size-fits-all.
Understanding how the model is built is the foundation of a solid test strategy.

Pre-trained models demand strong behavioral and risk testing.
Custom-trained models demand rigorous data and model validation.

As AI adoption grows, testers who understand this distinction will be the ones who catch the most expensive and dangerous bugs — before production.

Picture of Hai Pham Hoang

Hai Pham Hoang

Hai is a Senior Test Team Manager at NashTech with 20+ years of expertise in software testing. With a particular passion for software testing, Hai's specialization lies in Accessibility Testing. Her extensive knowledge encompasses international standards and guidelines, allowing her to ensure the highest levels of accessibility in software products. She is also a Certified Trusted Tester.

Leave a Comment

Suggested Article

Discover more from NashTech Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading