NashTech Insights

Pros and Cons of building Cloud-Native Apps

Rahul Miglani
Rahul Miglani
Table of Contents
laughing businesswoman working in office with laptop

Cloud-native application development has gained significant popularity in recent years as organizations embrace the flexibility, scalability, and efficiency offered by cloud computing. Cloud-native applications are designed and built specifically for cloud environments, leveraging the unique features and capabilities of cloud platforms. In this blog post, we will explore the pros and cons of developing cloud-native applications, helping businesses make informed decisions when considering this approach.

Pros of Developing Cloud-Native Applications:

Scalability and Elasticity:

One of the major advantages of cloud-native applications is the ability to scale seamlessly. Cloud platforms provide auto-scaling capabilities, allowing applications to automatically adjust resources based on demand. This elasticity enables businesses to handle fluctuating workloads efficiently, ensuring optimal performance and cost-effectiveness.

Fault Tolerance and High Availability:

Cloud-native applications are designed with fault tolerance in mind. By utilizing distributed architectures, redundant components, and load balancing techniques, these applications can remain highly available even in the face of failures. Cloud platforms offer built-in resilience features, such as multi-region deployments and automated failover, further enhancing application availability.

Rapid Deployment and Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD):

Cloud-native development promotes agile practices, enabling rapid deployment and continuous delivery of application updates. CI/CD pipelines automate the testing, integration, and deployment processes, reducing manual efforts and minimizing downtime. This allows businesses to iterate quickly, respond to customer feedback, and deliver new features faster to stay competitive in the market.

Cost Optimization:

Cloud-native applications offer cost optimization opportunities through resource allocation and utilization. With auto-scaling capabilities, businesses can scale resources up or down based on demand, avoiding overprovisioning and reducing unnecessary costs. Pay-as-you-go pricing models enable organizations to pay only for the resources they consume, optimizing costs and improving cost predictability.

Microservices Architecture:

Cloud-native applications often adopt a microservices architecture, where applications are composed of loosely coupled and independently deployable services. This architecture enables better scalability, maintainability, and resilience. Each microservice can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently, allowing teams to work autonomously and enabling faster innovation.

Cons of Developing Cloud-Native Applications:


Developing cloud-native applications can be more complex compared to traditional monolithic applications. Adopting microservices architecture requires careful planning and coordination to ensure proper service integration and communication. Additionally, managing multiple services and orchestrating deployments across distributed environments can introduce operational complexities.

Skill Set Requirements:

Developing cloud-native applications often requires specialized skills and knowledge. Developers need to understand cloud platforms, containerization technologies (e.g., Docker), orchestration tools (e.g., Kubernetes), and CI/CD practices. Acquiring and maintaining the necessary skills can be a challenge, especially for organizations transitioning from traditional development approaches.

Vendor Lock-in:

While cloud platforms offer significant advantages, there is a risk of vendor lock-in. Adopting cloud-specific services and proprietary APIs can limit portability and make it challenging to migrate to different platforms. It is essential for businesses to consider the long-term implications and assess the feasibility of moving applications across different cloud providers if needed.

Security and Compliance:

Developing cloud-native applications introduces unique security considerations. Applications must be designed with security in mind, ensuring proper access controls, encryption, and compliance with industry regulations. Businesses need to have a robust security strategy, including regular vulnerability assessments and monitoring, to mitigate potential risks and protect sensitive data.

Operational Complexity:

Operating cloud-native applications involves managing various components, including containers, orchestration systems, and monitoring tools. This operational complexity requires dedicated resources and expertise for ongoing management, monitoring, and troubleshooting. It is crucial to have proper monitoring and observability practices in place to detect and address issues promptly, ensuring the availability and performance of the cloud-native application.


Developing cloud-native applications offers numerous benefits, including scalability, fault tolerance, rapid deployment, cost optimization, and the flexibility of a microservices architecture. These advantages enable organizations to deliver innovative, resilient, and efficient applications that can adapt to changing business needs.

However, it’s important to consider the potential challenges and drawbacks associated with developing cloud-native applications. These include the complexity of managing distributed architectures, the need for specialized skills, the risk of vendor lock-in, security and compliance considerations, and the operational complexity of managing various components.

To mitigate these challenges, organizations should invest in proper planning, training, and security measures. They should also evaluate the long-term implications of vendor selection and consider strategies for avoiding vendor lock-in, such as adopting cloud-agnostic technologies or leveraging multi-cloud architectures.

Ultimately, the decision to develop cloud-native applications should be based on the specific requirements, goals, and resources of each organization. While there are challenges involved, the benefits of scalability, fault tolerance, and rapid deployment often outweigh the drawbacks, making cloud-native development an attractive approach for organizations seeking to leverage the full potential of cloud computing and drive digital transformation.

Rahul Miglani

Rahul Miglani

Rahul Miglani is Vice President at NashTech and Heads the DevOps Competency and also Heads the Cloud Engineering Practice. He is a DevOps evangelist with a keen focus to build deep relationships with senior technical individuals as well as pre-sales from customers all over the globe to enable them to be DevOps and cloud advocates and help them achieve their automation journey. He also acts as a technical liaison between customers, service engineering teams, and the DevOps community as a whole. Rahul works with customers with the goal of making them solid references on the Cloud container services platforms and also participates as a thought leader in the docker, Kubernetes, container, cloud, and DevOps community. His proficiency includes rich experience in highly optimized, highly available architectural decision-making with an inclination towards logging, monitoring, security, governance, and visualization.

1 thought on “Pros and Cons of building Cloud-Native Apps”

  1. we got to Choose wisely, weighing the advantages against the challenges, to leverage the full potential of cloud native applications. Thank you for this informative Blog..!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Suggested Article

%d bloggers like this: